Let's Take A Look At Some Dog Food Labels

 I get asked quite often what I feed my dogs. I am quite willing to share that information. Purina, Hills, and Royal Canin are all good choices. I feed Archie a regular Purina diet, the cat gets a Hills prescription diet to prevent urinary blockages, and Azza thrives on Royal Canin's Ultamino hydrolyzed protein diet. The prescription diets made by these three companies are incredibly useful for a wide array of diseases. Nothing magic here, we know that diet can reduce and delay clinical signs of many types of disease for both people and animals. A managed diet can improve performance. It can help a beef cow put on more weight faster, and can help a "no antibiotics ever" broiler chicken have a healthier gut to reduce bacterial infections. 

But the important point is that all three of these companies conduct feeding trials using real dogs to determine the nutritional profiles of their foods. Other companies analyze samples of their food in a lab only, for example burning it in a crucible to determine protein content. These kinds of assays are certainly useful, but they provide no information on bioavailability of important nutrients. Only feeding a living animal the actual food can tell you if that protein can be digested and used by the animal. If a dog food label says "food is formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by AAFCO," that food has only ever seen the inside of beakers and test tubes, not the inside of a dog. Grain-free? "Human-grade" ingredients? "Natural"? All marketing. All bullshit. All to make you, the human with the credit card, feel good. 

So this windy opening sets the stage for Archie's current situation. He got a stick jammed in the roof of his mouth a month ago or so, and some pieces of it broke off and were left behind in the tissues around his left upper molars. His bad breath prompted me to take a look in there...where I found this nasty hole in the roof of his mouth surrounded by friable, brown (necrotic) tissue. It bled when I touched it. I managed to get a large piece of stick out of the hole but even after starting some antibiotics, things weren't improving as much as I would have liked.

Of course, my imagination immediately went to the worst case scenario--abscess, lysis of the bony palate, formation of a fistula (an inappropriate hole between two spaces), damage to the roots of those huge molars. All Very Bad Things. I had to get a referral to another vet to get some dental radiographs made since my vet doesn't have dental rad equipment (it's specialized). That vet flushed a couple more small pieces of stick out, and helped calm my worst fears. She added a second antibiotic to go after the anaerobic bacteria, and recommended that I feed Archie a canned diet for two weeks to give the roof of his mouth a rest. 

Archie had not shown any evidence of pain or reluctance to eat or play, but he's a pretty stoic dog in general. Two weeks of canned food seemed reasonable. Except that I haven't calibrated any canned diets. I have no idea how much canned food to feed him. 

See, I feed Archie a calculated number of calories per day, including treats. He currently eats 1 cup of Purina Pro Plan Performance 30/20 Chicken and Rice kibble per day, divided into two meals, plus two tablespoons of plain yogurt, between 20 and 40 g of frozen green beans, and 10-20 kcals of treats. I adjust this basic plan for training and trialing days when he gets lots more treats. The kibble has 484 kcal/cup, so on most days Archie consumes around 510 kcal.

Let's examine three canned food options. Rachel Ray's Nutrish dog food comes in small plastic tubs. It looks and smells like human stew. The lamb and rice stew label says to feed an adult dog 1.5 tubs per 10 pounds per day. Archie weighs about 24 pounds so according to the label, I would need to feed him THREE tubs per day. Each tub is calculated to contain 244 kcal. Let's do the math, shall we? If I gave Archie THREE tubs of this stuff a day (not sure I could get this volume of food into him, but he certainly would give it a go), he would consume 732 kcal each day. If I give him the chicken and rice stew at the recommended volume, at 290 kcal/tub, he'd be getting 870 kcal per day. That is astonishing!

I also bought some Canidae Small Breed canned food. The chicken, salmon, and pumpkin recipe, which looks and smells as gross as that sounds, contains 123 kcal/can. The label recommends 2 cans per 6 lb of weight, so if I follow those recommendations, Archie is supposed to eat EIGHT cans of this per day. EIGHT! That's 984 kcal per day. OMG, that's even worse than the Nutrish stew. That's almost TWICE the numbers of calories that Archie needs each day.

ProPlan Focus canned food is my third example. If fed as recommended, Archie would need to eat 1.5 13-ounce cans per day of the (large breed) chicken and rice formula (their "small breed" options are grain-free and I don't feed grain-free). That comes out to about 475 kcal per day, which is in line with what he actually needs. So not only is the Purina food tested on real animals, the feeding guidelines are reasonable, not grossly over the top.

Here's the bottom line. Read labels. Don't be fooled by marketing. Measure your pet's food and calculate kcal per serving (can, cup, etc.). Are they healthy now? Figure out how many calories they eat per day--including all treats. Kibble is always going to be more nutritionally dense than canned food, which is mostly water. The volume of canned food will always be more than the equivalent kilocalories of dry food. And consider feeding Purina, Hills, or Royal Canin.